How rural policing gaps can make escaping domestic violence harder

chameleonseye/Getty Before murdering Molly Ticehurst in April 2024, court documents show Daniel Billings had threatened to exploit the limits of policing in her country town: I will come in the middle of the night […] The police won’t stop me.

I will get to you quicker than they will.

This threat illustrates how an abuser can use the prospect of delayed access to police and justice to frighten, control, or enact violence against victims.

We know that the burden of violence is uneven in Australia.

In contrast to the dominant view of idyllic and crime-free rural life, violence and indeed domestic violence, are a prominent feature in many communities.

Research shows us particular characteristics of rural life – such as police availability, distance, limited services and local relationships – can restrict options.

Improving police coverage therefore means making protection readily available, safe to seek and supported after the fact.

A disproportionate burden on rural communities In the year to June 2026, the recorded domestic violence-related assault rate in regional New South Wales was 73% higher than in Greater Sydney.

More specifically, in the Far West and Orana regions, it was 3.4 times the state rate.

Still, much of this violence never reaches the police and, as with much rural crime, there is a significant “dark figure”.

In the 2021–22 national Personal Safety Survey , 79% of women who had experienced physical or sexual violence from their current live-in partner had never told police.

For previous live-in partners, this figure was 68%.

Responding to such violence is a challenge if officers are unavailable.

In September of 2024, New South Wales had 2,279 police vacancies , 12% of its total authorised positions.