Saturday 17 October 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇦🇺 AU ▾
BREAKING
› Von der Leyen and Costa brief the media after two-day EU summit – Europe live› Carrick includes Martínez in squad; Madrid call for Tebas to quit over Goebbels comparison: football news – as it happened› British Cycling under scrutiny over allegations of ‘toxic culture’ in leadership team› Premier League news: go bananas: Maresca loving fans’ show of defiance; James injury blow for Blues› Brazil’s Lula says he now backs lowering age of criminal responsibility to 16› Sky Blues coach coy on defender's future at ALM club› The Florian Wirtz mystery: why has he not found Leverkusen form at Liverpool?› Brighter days ahead for Wanderers, promises ALM coach› Proteas urged to wear down Australia's bowling machines› Hazlewood feeling free as bowlers enter golden age› Von der Leyen and Costa brief the media after two-day EU summit – Europe live› Carrick includes Martínez in squad; Madrid call for Tebas to quit over Goebbels comparison: football news – as it happened› British Cycling under scrutiny over allegations of ‘toxic culture’ in leadership team› Premier League news: go bananas: Maresca loving fans’ show of defiance; James injury blow for Blues› Brazil’s Lula says he now backs lowering age of criminal responsibility to 16› Sky Blues coach coy on defender's future at ALM club› The Florian Wirtz mystery: why has he not found Leverkusen form at Liverpool?› Brighter days ahead for Wanderers, promises ALM coach› Proteas urged to wear down Australia's bowling machines› Hazlewood feeling free as bowlers enter golden age
Australian News

Identity of prominent Queensland public figure in extortion case remains secret

PerthNow ·
Identity of prominent Queensland public figure in extortion case remains secret

The identity of a Queensland public figure embroiled in a lurid extortion case will remain a secret following a decision by the Supreme Court.

A high-profile Queensland man who allegedly had an affair with a woman in 2017, while married, will have his identity concealed despite a legal contest from multiple media organisations to uncover his name.

The alleged affair has been at the centre of a months-long court battle in Far North Queensland after the man’s name was mentioned by lawyers in open court in May.

The court was told a man accused of a domestic violence extortion charge in Cairns blackmailed a woman by threatening to reveal details about an affair she allegedly had with the prominent male figure, referred to under the pseudonym “MM”.

The high-profile man is not a party in the extortion proceedings and is not accused of any legal wrongdoing in the matter.

He was not the named target of the alleged extortion, nor facing any charges; however, upon hearing his name referenced in open court proceedings, a Cairns magistrate issued a blanket non-publication order barring anyone, including media, from publishing his name or any details of the case.

A suppression order over his identity and the identities of the parties involved in the matter was finalised in June, after the Queensland Police Commissioner brought forward an application which was approved by the court.

Media organisations challenged the order, elevating the matter to the Cairns Supreme Court in July.

Legal representative for the media Andrew O’Brien KC argued there was no legal precedent for protecting a third party who was not a witness or a complainant in similar extortion matters.

Jonathan Horton KC for the police argued the complainant would be left vulnerable if the man’s identity was revealed.

On Friday, August 28, Justice James Henry ruled the suppression order over the man’s identity be upheld.

While the gag order remained in place, chatter swirled on social media and online forums as news of the mystery man’s identity was allegedly shared from inside the courthouse.

A Cairns-based content creator who attended the initial court hearing posted the news on social media immediately after it was first heard, attracting public interest.

He then allegedly continued to post about the case and was later charged with disobeying a lawful order issued by statutory authority and two counts of publication of identifying information in proceedings.

Read the full article on PerthNow ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.perthnow.com.au — the content belongs to PerthNow.

More from PerthNow

See all ›

More in Australian News

See all ›