Phoebe Gates knew Phia shopping app took credit for sales it didn’t drive
Phia co-founders Phoebe Gates and Sophia Kianni pushed for features in the e-commerce startup’s software that took credit for sales it didn’t drive , according to internal communications and people with knowledge of the matter.
The founders were aware of the practice for at least seven months going back to December, according to the people and messages posted on the company’s internal Slack channels that were shared with Bloomberg News. The people asked not to be identified as they were not authorized to discuss the issue.
That timetable runs counter to public remarks by the company, which said on July 8 that it had only become aware of the situation “within the last 24 hours.”
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
Phia bills itself as a “ personal shopping assistant ” that helps users find the lowest prices on a broad range of clothes and fashion accessories. It operates a browser extension that, when used as part of the online checkout process, can quickly find discount codes for products and save shoppers money. When a shopper uses Phia’s product to help make a purchase, the company earns a commission from the retailer for helping drive the sale.
But Phia’s browser extension was also designed to report that the startup drove a sale even when its product was never used – a practice that resulted in increased commissions, Bloomberg reported in July. The company said at the time that the problem stemmed from a software bug that had only been discovered on the day it was contacted by Bloomberg.
The strategy, which is broadly prohibited by Phia’s commercial partners, was implemented at least as far back as December, the internal chats show, and involved purchases made on the websites of several major retailers , including Nike, Gap and Nordstrom. A Bloomberg review of Phia’s historical source code confirmed these features existed.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on financialpost.com — the content belongs to Financial Post.