Trump pitches White House ballroom as a ‘highly integrated military complex’ to Supreme Court
President Donald Trump sought U.S. Supreme Court approval to keep building his massive new White House ballroom after two lower courts said he was flouting the law by proceeding without congressional authorization.
In a filing made public Friday, Trump asked the justices for an emergency order letting construction continue without restrictions while a legal fight continues. An appeals court ruling blocking most above-ground work will take effect Aug. 21 unless the Supreme Court intervenes.
The request thrusts the court into a highly symbolic clash over Trump’s efforts to unilaterally remake the aesthetics of the nation’s capital. If completed, the ballroom addition would be 90,000 square feet, larger than the White House mansion and West Wing combined, with a security bunker underneath. Trump demolished the East Wing to make way for the ornate structure.
Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
Trump told the Supreme Court he is building a “highly integrated military complex that incorporates a classical, but highly secured, ballroom and crucial national-security facilities.”
The filing came with new photos and renderings of the facility, including images of a “Drone Port” on top of the structure and a gold seal over the ballroom’s entrance. The administration said the project is 65 per cent complete.
Chief Justice John Roberts asked the group challenging the ballroom to file a response by next Tuesday, signalling the likelihood of quick action by the high court.
A federal district judge and appeals court both said above-ground work needed to stop. In a 2-1 ruling on Aug. 7, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said that Congress, not the president, has control over federal property.
“Whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for executive self-help,” wrote Judges Patricia Millett and Brad Garcia, both Democratic appointees. Republican-appointed Judge Neomi Rao dissented.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on nationalpost.com — the content belongs to National Post.
