2026年10月9日星期五 媒体关于🌓
🇨🇳 CN ▾
快讯
› Pentagon unveils US$350 million quantum computing push as China rivalry grows› After failed US execution, Christa Pike is walking but mentally ‘foggy’, lawyer says› Venezuela’s Maduro and wife Flores tortured US citizens to stay in power: US prosecutors› The long-deployed USS Abraham Lincoln returns home to San Diego from Middle East› US probes Harvard, Yale, MIT, other universities over alleged visa fraud, with China focus› German official killed, another injured during firearms inspection› UK navy sailor appears in London court on charges of spying for Russia› China’s BYD considering lithium battery plant in Argentina, foreign minister says› Trump says US will not attack Iran before November’s midterm elections› Trump misnames Muslim senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed ‘Mohammed’› Pentagon unveils US$350 million quantum computing push as China rivalry grows› After failed US execution, Christa Pike is walking but mentally ‘foggy’, lawyer says› Venezuela’s Maduro and wife Flores tortured US citizens to stay in power: US prosecutors› The long-deployed USS Abraham Lincoln returns home to San Diego from Middle East› US probes Harvard, Yale, MIT, other universities over alleged visa fraud, with China focus› German official killed, another injured during firearms inspection› UK navy sailor appears in London court on charges of spying for Russia› China’s BYD considering lithium battery plant in Argentina, foreign minister says› Trump says US will not attack Iran before November’s midterm elections› Trump misnames Muslim senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed ‘Mohammed’
国际

US Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions for midterms

South China Morning Post - World ·
US Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions for midterms

The US Supreme Court on Monday rejected President Donald Trump’s bid to restrict mail ballots for the midterm elections, capping a flurry of last-minute legal action with voting already under way.

The decision allows states to continue sending out mail ballots under the same processes they’ve used for years.

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas publicly dissented from the brief order.

The Trump administration had asked the court, once again at the centre of a roiling political controversy,...

在South China Morning Post - World阅读完整文章 ›

此摘要由5News从媒体的公开信息源汇聚而成。 包含完整背景的全文在www.scmp.com — 内容归South China Morning Post - World所有。

更多来自South China Morning Post - World的报道

查看全部 ›

更多国际新闻

查看全部 ›