Cheque-bounce cases: Supreme Court gives Rajpal Yadav last chance of two weeks to deposit ₹2 crore

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

A file photo of actor Rajpal Yadav in New Delhi. | Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (September 15, 2026) gave the last opportunity of two weeks to actor Rajpal Yadav to come out with a concrete proposal to pay an outstanding amount to a private firm and directed him to deposit ₹2 crore with the Supreme Court registry.

The complainant alleged that, in 2013, Rajpal Yadav tendered seven cheques of ₹1.05 crore each towards settlement of financial assistance of ₹5 crore to him for a film in 2010. The cheques were dishonoured, the firm further alleged.

According to the complainant, an agreement between the parties in 2012 stated that Yadav, his wife and their company had agreed to repay around ₹11 crore, including interest.

A Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana extended his exemption from surrendering till October 5. On July 10, the Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Yadav in multiple cheque-bounce cases and sentenced him to three months' imprisonment.

"He is perfect at doing drama... Earlier orders of the court have not been complied with," the Bench said, adding that Yadav's conduct does not inspire confidence but a last opportunity will be granted to him.

Appearing for Yadav, senior advocate P.S. Patwalia sought two weeks to come up with a concrete proposal to pay the outstanding amount and said he will be depositing ₹2 crore to prove his bona fide.

Mr. Patwalia said he has spent four-and-a-half months in prison and Yadav's friends in the entertainment industry have to bail him out.

Senior advocate Ajit Sinha, appearing for complainant, M/s Murali Projects Private Limited, said they are concerned with the money as Yadav has not honoured his commitments. The Bench posted the matter for further hearing on October 5.

On September 8, the Supreme Court issued notice on Yadav's plea and said that subject to deposit of ₹5 crore with the registry of this court, there will be exemption from surrendering.

On July 10, the High Court refused to condone the "extraordinary" delay of 1,894 days, or more than five years, in filing petitions against the conviction and directed Yadav to pay more than ₹1 crore to the complainant in each of the seven complaints.

It, however, clarified that around ₹2 crore already paid by the actor shall be adjusted, and kept the sentence in abeyance for two months to give Yadav time to approach the appellate court against the decision.

In the 108-page verdict, the High Court observed that Yadav repeatedly failed to honour his undertakings on making payment to the complainant, M/s Murali Projects Private Limited, and while the court made "earnest efforts" to facilitate an amicable resolution in the matter, the actor categorically refused to make any further payment.