Saturday, 10 October 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇮🇳 IN ▾
BREAKING
› Imran Khan detained by Mumbai Police during protest at August Kranti Maidan; says, “I am here to see why people’s voices are being suppressed”› Visakhapatnam’s air breached national standard on 259 of 382 days; data show winter brings the worst› Verstappen seals sprint win, takes pole in Singapore as Antonelli extends title lead› Farmers celebrate anniversary of first water release from Mullaperiyar dam› Trump says Russia to immediately supply diesel to U.S. after talks with Putin› Anti-CEC protest LIVE updates: 'We still don't know where they are', CJP members allege they have no information on detained CJP leaders' whereabouts› Delhi protest: Stopped at police barricades, daily-wage workers lose day’s earnings› Tushar Gandhi, Imran Khan among 600 protesters detained in Mumbai› Desalination plants back in the reckoning in Keralam, govt. sets up expert committee to study feasibility› Ranji Trophy: Karnataka faces Andhra test in opening match› Imran Khan detained by Mumbai Police during protest at August Kranti Maidan; says, “I am here to see why people’s voices are being suppressed”› Visakhapatnam’s air breached national standard on 259 of 382 days; data show winter brings the worst› Verstappen seals sprint win, takes pole in Singapore as Antonelli extends title lead› Farmers celebrate anniversary of first water release from Mullaperiyar dam› Trump says Russia to immediately supply diesel to U.S. after talks with Putin› Anti-CEC protest LIVE updates: 'We still don't know where they are', CJP members allege they have no information on detained CJP leaders' whereabouts› Delhi protest: Stopped at police barricades, daily-wage workers lose day’s earnings› Tushar Gandhi, Imran Khan among 600 protesters detained in Mumbai› Desalination plants back in the reckoning in Keralam, govt. sets up expert committee to study feasibility› Ranji Trophy: Karnataka faces Andhra test in opening match
Latest

Saharanpur mosque demolition: The dispute and questions over haste

The Hindu ·
Saharanpur mosque demolition: The dispute and questions over haste

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

The mosque inside the District Magistrate’s office complex in Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, is being demolished on September 5. File

Bulldozers rolled into the Saharanpur collectorate compound before dawn on September 5, 2026. By the time the town woke up, a mosque that its management committee said had stood inside the campus for around 150 years, lay in ruins.

Six earth-movers carried out the demolition under a heavy security cordon that included Rapid Action Force (RAF) and police teams brought in from neighbouring districts.

The mosque had been on the administration’s radar for months. But the question that has grown bigger than the demolition itself is the speed with which the action was carried out.

The mosque committee lost its final legal appeal on September 2. The demolition followed roughly 48-60 hours after the ruling, leaving the committee with little time to approach a higher court.

The controversy over the mosque started back in February 2025, when Vikas Tyagi, a Bajrang Dal leader, filed a complaint with the Saharanpur District Magistrate alleging that the mosque stood illegally on government land.

In his complaint, Mr. Tyagi claimed that the caretakers of the mosque were renting out rooms in the complex and collecting rent from a sub-post office operating there, and that they had no right to do so.

The complaint turned into a formal petition in March 2025, filed under the Public Premises Act before the city magistrate’s court.

Before the city magistrate’s court, the mosque committee, led by Mohammad Tanvir Ahmed, submitted that the religious structure had existed at the site for around 150 years, well before the collectorate complex came into existence. The committee further contended that the land’s original owners, whom Mr. Ahmed identified as Yaqub Khan and Wahid Khan, had dedicated it as waqf property for use by worshippers.

The district administration, however, informed the court that the land on which the mosque stood had originally been meant for a rest house for people visiting the collectorate for business. It submitted that the land was subsequently used for a mosque without authorisation.

In his July 16, 2026, judgment, the magistrate said the mosque committee had failed to establish ownership of the land and held that the property in question was owned by the Uttar Pradesh Government.

The court held that the defendants had illegally occupied 315 square metres of government land and constructed a mosque on it without lawful authority, making the structure liable for eviction.

The court also considered it appropriate to calculate compensation from Fasli year 1359, corresponding to 1952 in the Gregorian calendar, following the abolition of the zamindari system. Based on the minimum circle rate of ₹58,200 per square metre and 70 years of alleged illegal occupation, the compensation was calculated at around ₹6.41 crore. The mosque management was given a 30 days to vacate the premises.

Read the full article on The Hindu ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.thehindu.com — the content belongs to The Hindu.

More from The Hindu

See all ›

More in Latest

See all ›