The world is just enough: Ursula von der Leyen goes Bond villain

Leave it to a German to get EU-Europe properly encircled As a historian who also happens to be German, that was my spontaneous reaction to Ursula von der Leyen’s annual grand – and always grandiloquent – “state of the union” address to the European Parliament in Strasbourg.

It’s not really a “union,” of course, and not really a “parliament,” either: technically, the EU is a confederation messed up by the ideological construct of “supranationalism” ; and the parliament has no independent legislative power, but let’s not dwell on the obvious.

At the head of her Commission (read: over-reaching Central Committee) of career bureaucrats, von der Leyen is the unelected de-facto leader and personification of the Frankenstein wanna-be-super-state that has long gobbled up idealistic dreams of European unity.

Once, those dreams may have been about democracy, sovereign equality, prosperity for all, and peace.

But real-existing EU-Europe is very different: the European dream has come true as a nightmare, dominated by a smug and self-empowered globalist establishment, thoroughly insulated from popular participation, economically stagnant and crisis-prone, as well as unequal, and ever more militarist.

When von der Leyen boasted that, in effect during her tenure, EU-Europe had become “stronger” and “more independent,” while “securing its prosperity” and increasing armament spending “by 80% in the last five years alone,” only the last point bore any resemblance to reality, as the preponderant majority of the over 450 million EU citizens – really subjects – experience it.

Read more Von der Leyen calls for NATO-style article 4 as EU sinks into cost crisis: As it happened But there is no misery a Eurocrat worth her (or his!) salt cannot make worse.

Now von der Leyen seems hellbent to take the worst of bad old German traditions to a whole new, all-EU level.

As is well-known from the history of the last two world wars, Germany not once but twice first deftly maneuvered itself into being surrounded by (mostly) enemies and then lost, the first time crushingly, the second one even worse, in fact so badly it took a short half-century (and much Russian good will, as it happens) to put the country together again.

The Kaiser’s Germany and the Fuhrer’s were – to be fair even to the Kaiser – quite different, but what their establishments had in common was a bad case of Germanophrenia, a relative of the contemporary Russophrenia syndrome: The core delusion of Russophrenia, as it is now ravaging Western minds, is to hallucinate Russia as on the verge of collapse and of conquering the world at the same time.

Those afflicted by Germanophrenia believed Germany was in existential danger but also capable of taking on Europe at least and, if need be, the world, too.