Thursday, 8 October 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇬🇧 UK ▾
BREAKING
› Hunter Bell celebrates in Team GB's 'glam' female track success› Chelsea latest: Caicedo features in friendly as midfielder steps up recovery› Swiss Darts Trophy 2026: Schedule, draw, dates as Bunting defends his title› 'It's about time!' - F1 drivers excited amid Rwanda GP rumours› 'Stick together, enjoy the ride and smile' - Haaland's message to Man City fans› Campbell would end retirement to fight Benn: 'He was insulting me!'› Russell, Antonelli to race with different specs amid Mercedes upgrade concern› 'It wasn't good enough' - Hamilton reveals 'huge' talks over Ferrari blunder› Southampton boss Eckert welcomes 'clarity' after Spygate suspended FA ban› Man Utd held back as Spurs spent big - Different strategies collide on Saturday› Hunter Bell celebrates in Team GB's 'glam' female track success› Chelsea latest: Caicedo features in friendly as midfielder steps up recovery› Swiss Darts Trophy 2026: Schedule, draw, dates as Bunting defends his title› 'It's about time!' - F1 drivers excited amid Rwanda GP rumours› 'Stick together, enjoy the ride and smile' - Haaland's message to Man City fans› Campbell would end retirement to fight Benn: 'He was insulting me!'› Russell, Antonelli to race with different specs amid Mercedes upgrade concern› 'It wasn't good enough' - Hamilton reveals 'huge' talks over Ferrari blunder› Southampton boss Eckert welcomes 'clarity' after Spygate suspended FA ban› Man Utd held back as Spurs spent big - Different strategies collide on Saturday
World

SF immigration judge says she was fired 48 hours after she questioned ICE’s treatment of asylum seeker

The Independent World ·
SF immigration judge says she was fired 48 hours after she questioned ICE’s treatment of asylum seeker

A San Francisco-based federal immigration judge was fired after she questioned Trump administration legal tactics and resisted a request from Immigration and Customs Enforcement to fast-track the deportation of a teen asylum seeker, a lawsuit claims.

In the complaint, filed Thursday in federal court, Chloe Dillon alleges she was fired roughly 48 hours after sending a message to a superior relating her concerns over an August 2025 incident. In the message, Dillon wrote that she was alarmed a teenage asylum seeker had been arrested by ICE after they left her courtroom, where she had just delayed ICE’s request to dismiss the individual’s case and place them into expedited removal proceedings.

Prior to the arrest, Dillon gave the individual, who had been representing themselves, time to find a lawyer.

“When you have judges who are in fear that they will be fired for the decisions that they’re making, it has completely undermined the basic principles of judicial adjudication,” Dillon told SFGate . “I don’t see how you have fair and unbiased tribunals in the immigration court when there is this atmosphere of fear and intimidation.”

The asylum seeker had originally shown up to court representing themselves, and Dillon concluded the individual was “almost certainly a designated unaccompanied minor who could not be placed into expedited removal proceedings , and who thus had the right to have his already-filed asylum application decided first by an asylum officer, and then, if necessary, by the Immigration Court,” according to the suit.

The San Francisco immigration court was already under pressure from the Trump administration to comply with requests from ICE to transfer cases to other venues, according to the suit. Dillon alleges a superior told her in spring of 2025 that the White House “was watching the issue and cautioned her against resisting the directive.”

Nonetheless, Dillon refused to comply with some of these requests, and she similarly pushed back in cases where she felt ICE lacked the jurisdiction to re-calendar cases involving unaccompanied minors.

In her August email to her superior, Dillon argued ICE had been “disrupting the orderly administration of justice,” the suit claims.

The complaint, which names the Justice Department and Attorney General Todd Blanche, among others, seeks to have Dillon reinstated and given back pay, damages and a declaration the firing was unlawful. The lawsuit argues Dillon’s constitutional rights under the First and Fifth Amendment were violated, along with federal law, and it alleges the judge was fired without notice or an opportunity to challenge the decision.

Over the last year-and-a-half, the Trump administration fired most of the immigration judges in San Francisco and shuttered one of the main immigration courts there.

Under the Trump administration, immigration officials have stepped up arrests near courthouses, schools and other sensitive locations.

Read the full article on The Independent World ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.independent.co.uk — the content belongs to The Independent World.

More from The Independent World

See all ›

More in World

See all ›