AI companies are 'begging the government to regulate them' says JD Vance, but nobody seems willing to actually slow the AI race

After years of treating faster, bigger, and more capable AI as something approaching a moral imperative, the people running some of the world’s most powerful AI companies suddenly agree that perhaps everyone should ease off the accelerator.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei kicked off the latest round with an essay titled “We Must Pace the Frontier,” warning that AI capabilities are advancing faster than the safeguards needed to contain their risks.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis quickly endorsed the idea.

It's extraordinary that the leaders of companies locked in one of the most expensive technological races in history are publicly agreeing that the race itself needs to slow down.

One awkward detail is buried beneath the sudden outbreak of corporate caution.

Namely that nobody involved has said which forthcoming frontier model will arrive later because of it.

“Pacing the frontier” can mean almost anything until somebody attaches a calendar to it.

None of the companies supporting Anthropic’s proposal has publicly identified a forthcoming model it intends to delay as part of the initiative, nor has anyone defined whether slowing down means an extra week of safety testing, six months between major generations, or something more dramatic.

For now, the most concrete commitments concern independent evaluators, monitoring, safety standards and coordination rather than an announced reduction in the cadence of frontier-model releases It's odd enough to stand out even to those outside the tech space.

U.S. vice president JD Vance said he felt “a little bit weird" about the fact that you have so many frontier AI tech companies kind of coming to the government and begging the government to regulate them, and that it came off as “a bit of a Trojan horse.” His skepticism does not settle whether regulation is necessary, but it highlights the contradiction running through the current debate.

Altruism or exclusion? There are good reasons for the sudden anxiety.

Amodei has warned about AI enabling cyberattacks, bioterrorism, economic disruption, and eventually systems humans could struggle to control.

His latest proposal calls for independent safety evaluators with deep access inside frontier labs, coordination among companies on shared standards, and international cooperation around particularly dangerous capabilities.

That's rather different from the plain-English meaning of slowing development.