Thursday, 8 October 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇬🇧 UK ▾
BREAKING
› Hunter Bell celebrates in Team GB's 'glam' female track success› Chelsea latest: Caicedo features in friendly as midfielder steps up recovery› Swiss Darts Trophy 2026: Schedule, draw, dates as Bunting defends his title› 'It's about time!' - F1 drivers excited amid Rwanda GP rumours› 'Stick together, enjoy the ride and smile' - Haaland's message to Man City fans› Campbell would end retirement to fight Benn: 'He was insulting me!'› Russell, Antonelli to race with different specs amid Mercedes upgrade concern› 'It wasn't good enough' - Hamilton reveals 'huge' talks over Ferrari blunder› Southampton boss Eckert welcomes 'clarity' after Spygate suspended FA ban› Man Utd held back as Spurs spent big - Different strategies collide on Saturday› Hunter Bell celebrates in Team GB's 'glam' female track success› Chelsea latest: Caicedo features in friendly as midfielder steps up recovery› Swiss Darts Trophy 2026: Schedule, draw, dates as Bunting defends his title› 'It's about time!' - F1 drivers excited amid Rwanda GP rumours› 'Stick together, enjoy the ride and smile' - Haaland's message to Man City fans› Campbell would end retirement to fight Benn: 'He was insulting me!'› Russell, Antonelli to race with different specs amid Mercedes upgrade concern› 'It wasn't good enough' - Hamilton reveals 'huge' talks over Ferrari blunder› Southampton boss Eckert welcomes 'clarity' after Spygate suspended FA ban› Man Utd held back as Spurs spent big - Different strategies collide on Saturday
World

Supreme Court blocks Trump's plan to restrict mail-in ballots

BBC News World ·
Supreme Court blocks Trump's plan to restrict mail-in ballots

The US Supreme Court has rejected President Donald Trump's plan to restrict voting by mail before November's midterm elections, in a setback for the White House.

The justices upheld a federal judge's order that temporarily blocked the US Postal Service (USPS) from moving forwards with new requirements for postal ballots.

One legal group said in response that the decision would prevent the USPS from "sowing chaos in our elections".

But it is unlikely to be the final word on the matter. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative, agreed with the ruling, but indicated he might later rule in Trump's favour as litigation in the case continues.

Trump, who argued the rules would combat electoral fraud, signed an executive order in March that directed the USPS to deliver ballots only to voters on lists of citizens.

Legal challenges argued that the move violated states' constitutional rights to run elections.

Election officials from 24 Democratic-led states and the District of Colombia also warned that the proposed changes were not ready for implementation and could prevent ballots from reaching voters.

Meanwhile some Republican-led states, including Florida, Louisiana, and Montana, supported the president in court filings.

Justice Kavanaugh wrote in the opinion that there was "at least a fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal Service's statutory authority". But he argued that "applying the rule in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious".

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, also conservatives, dissented. They wrote that the challenge to Trump's order was a "Hail Mary pass" that was unlikely to be successful ultimately.

"The Postal Service has broad authority to regulate the mail," they added.

Supreme Court allows late-arriving mail-in ballots in defeat for Trump

About 30% of voters, mostly Democrats, cast postal ballots in the general election two years ago. However, several states like Oregon, Washington, and Colorado rely heavily or entirely on mail ballots for their elections, requiring Republicans to use the system as well.

Seven Republican state election officials warned the justices , external that allowing significant changes to mail ballot rules so close to the midterm elections would "lead to mistakes, delays, and confusion".

Read the full article on BBC News World ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.bbc.co.uk — the content belongs to BBC News World.

More from BBC News World

See all ›

More in World

See all ›