Swan Song by Charles Spencer review: Revenge dish is even better aged 30 years

The Standard's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

LS Melanie McDonagh 2 minutes ago COMMENTS Apart from the bombshells, what’s the book like? The trouble about reading Swan Song: Diana, my sister , Earl Spencer’s account of his sister Princess Diana, is that we all know the best reveals, the one about the then Prince Charles hissing down the phone at Spencer after his sister’s death: “Rest assured, we’ll forget her soon enough!”; the other that he seemed “giddily elated” by her death. Oh, and the valet. Everything else is a bit anticlimactic after those three corkers, vigorously disputed by the Palace and counter-asserted by the Earl.

But don’t give up on Swan Song just like that. It’s a plum pudding of revelations, enlivened by the piquant sauce of revenge. For what it’s worth, the book is well written, the Earl being the author of nine previous books.

For my money, the big reveal in the book was the “closely kept family secret” that when his father, John, was a royal equerry, “Queen [Elizabeth] and courtier had a romantic connection, which was ended by Lord Mountbatten”, presumably because he was keeping the then young princess for his nephew Prince Philip. The irony that, a generation on, Charles and Diana brought that blighted romance to fruition isn’t lost on Spencer.

Oh but there are so many reveals in this book: so many scores settled, so many slights remembered. My very favourite was the one about Princess Michael of Kent saying to Diana after the Queen had removed her HRH title, “‘Don’t worry, Diana – you only need to curtsy to me when we are in public”.

Amazon Another good one was about Diana and Charles’s father’s last illness when their detested stepmother, Raine, instructed his nurses to bar his children from visiting: Diana was furious. “Raine suddenly went low: ‘I have always felt so very sorry for the Prince of Wales, marrying somebody quite as stupid as you.’ Diana paused for a second, surprised at the intensity of the spite. She then took a step forward, hooked a long leg round Raine’s calves before shoving her down the carpeted staircase”. My regard for Diana, already considerable, rocketed.

“The aim of this book is to tell the truth about Diana from her brother’s perspective”

But what about Charles Spencer’s motivation? The Palace has hinted, not terribly subtly, that the “much married” Earl Spencer is out to make money… well, possibly. But he makes a perfectly plausible case that with the 30th anniversary of his sister’s death coming up, he was getting fed up being asked to make a contribution to other people’s accounts; instead, he’d tell the story himself, thank you. Added to which, he said, neither of his parents made it to 70; so, now in his sixties, he wanted to put his bit on the record: “the aim of this book is to tell the truth about Diana from her brother’s perspective”.

Earl Spencer, Prince William, Prince Harry and the then-Prince of Wales wait as the hearse carrying the coffin of Diana, Princess of Wales prepares to leave Westminster Abbey following her funeral (Fiona Hanson/PA) PA Archive Whatever.