Thursday, 27 August 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇬🇧 UK ▾
BREAKING
Technology

Police investigating possible forgery at AFRINIC election

The Register ·
Police investigating possible forgery at AFRINIC election

Police in Mauritius are conducting a criminal investigation into possible forgery related to the annulled June 2025 board election staged by the African Network Information Centre (AFRINIC).

AFRINIC is the regional internet registry (RIR) for 54 countries in Africa and the Indian Ocean region.

In recent years it has experienced governance and operational problems and been embroiled in a complex set of interlocking legal disputes with one of its members, Cloud Innovation, regarding AFRINIC’s powers to terminate users who do not follow its rules for using IP addresses.

The disputes with Cloud Innovation saw AFRINIC unable to convene a board for several years.

Courts in Mauritius placed the registry in receivership.

The receiver eventually brought the registry into a state that made it possible to stage a board election in June 2025.

AFRINIC offered members the chance to vote online, by attending a day of in-person voting in Mauritius, or by appointing a proxy to vote for them at the in-person voting session.

During that in-person voting session, the Nomination Committee that oversaw the election became concerned about the voting process and called off the election.

AFRINIC’s receiver later annulled the vote, which was re-run under different rules later in the year.

AFRINIC has never commented on the reasons for the annulment.

The Register sought comment from the four UK-based barristers who comprised the Nomination Committee.

None were willing to answer our questions.

AFRINIC’s receiver has also not responded to our request for comment.

After the annulment, South Africa’s Internet Service Providers' Association (ISPA) made two claims about irregularities at the election: “A duly authorised representative of a resource holder attempting to vote, only to be informed that another person had already submitted a vote on their behalf thanks to a Power of Attorney, which that resource holder had not provided to any third party." "A representative of a resource holder, learning that a Power of Attorney had been submitted on their behalf, only to find that that particular Power of Attorney (the existence of which had already been recorded by AFRINIC staff) had been mysteriously removed from the record by the time a copy was requested.” Mauritius Police this week confirmed to The Register that it is investigating the matter as a possible forgery case.

Read the full article on The Register ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.theregister.com — the content belongs to The Register.

More from The Register

See all ›

More in Technology

See all ›