Summer Walker ‘Disappointed’ by Interscope Lawsuit But ‘Open to a Constructive Resolution’

Summer Walker ’s attorney plans to “vigorously defend” against Interscope’s lawsuit over her record deal — but says they are still willing to meet the label at the negotiating table.

Walker is in a dispute with the Universal Music Group (UMG) subsidiary over the status of the contract she signed back in 2017.

The R&B singer sent a legal notice in August terminating the record deal under California’s seven-year statute, which limits the length of personal services contracts in the state.

Interscope then responded on Friday (Oct.

9) by suing Walker , claiming she’ll owe $50 million if she walks away before fulfilling her album commitments.

Related Summer Walker in Legal Dispute With Interscope Over Record Deal Hilary Duff to Receive Outstanding Pop Tour of the Year Award at 2026 Billboard Live Music Summit Judge Rules Woman Accused of Shooting at Rihanna & A$AP Rocky's Home Mentally Fit to Stand Trial After that lawsuit was filed, Walker’s attorney Keith Moten released a statement saying, “While we are disappointed that Interscope has chosen to pursue litigation, we are confident in Summer’s legal position and her right to challenge the continued enforceability of her recording contract with Interscope.” “Summer has made extraordinary contributions to Interscope’s success, and we believe she deserves the opportunity to move forward under terms that fairly recognize her value as an artist,” added Moten.

“We intend to vigorously defend against Interscope’s claims and pursue appropriate legal relief.” Moten said they plan to countersue Interscope.

At the same time, however, he emphasized that an amicable settlement with Interscope would be a welcome outcome: “The parties’ discussions have remained professional, and Summer remains open to a constructive resolution.

She hopes that the matter can be resolved in a manner that respects the interests of all involved and avoids unnecessary or prolonged litigation.

In the meantime, Summer remains focused on her music, her artistry, her children and her fans.” The latter part of Moten’s statement echoes the tone set by Interscope in its own statement when the lawsuit was filed Friday.

An Interscope rep told Billboard that litigation was necessary to preserve its contractual rights under the parameters of the seven-year statute, which provides a 45-day window for labels to sue for damages after receiving a termination notice.