Rory McIlroy gets snarky on the return of LIV Golf players to PGA Tour: 'have they brought value?'
Despite the FedEx Cup Playoffs entering their second week, and even more historic dominance from world No.
1 Scottie Scheffler, the main topic of conversation in golf right now is the future of the breakaway LIV Golf tour .
With Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund pulling their financial support for LIV after the 2026 season and the lack of clarity around the mysterious investors who are reportedly willing to back it, there's plenty of discussion around what comes next.
Some players, like Ian Poulter, have said that time is running out for LIV to arrange more funding.
Bryson DeChambeau , arguably the tour's biggest star, has seemingly been keeping his options open.
While it appears likely that Jon Rahm, the other big star on LIV, may try to bolt and return to the PGA Tour sooner rather than later.
Even if it includes substantial financial penalties.
JON RAHM COULD BE SET TO LEAVE LIV GOLF, PAY MASSIVE PENALTIES TO RETURN TO PGA TOUR IN MATTER OF WEEKS Given all the discussion, it's not surprising that one of the most prominent figures in the PGA-LIV battle was asked his thoughts about it, again, at the BMW Championship in St.
Louis.
During media availability on Wednesday, Rory McIlroy was asked about LIV golfers returning to the PGA Tour and whether they'd provide value by returning, and gave just about the snarkiest possible answer.
"I mean, I’d argue have they brought value to LIV?" he said.
"I think the PGA Tour's in a really good spot." McIlroy added a bit more context, saying that while he's not involved with whatever negotiations might be happening, he's confident that whatever deal they get may not be as lenient as the one Brooks Koepka got.
BROOKS KOEPKA CALLS FIRST YEAR BACK ON PGA TOUR 'PRETTY PATHETIC' AFTER MISSING FEDEX CUP PLAYOFFS "I mean, look, eventually they will," McIlroy said.
"I'm not part of these discussions, but I'm pretty sure they're not going to be welcomed back straight away.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.foxnews.com — the content belongs to Fox News.
