What to Know About the Apparent Iranian Threat Against Barron Trump
Barron Trump, the son of President Donald Trump, stands in the House Chamber of the U.S.
Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Feb.
24, 2026. —Andrew Caballero-Reynolds—AFP/Getty Images The U.S.
Secret Service said it was aware of a video broadcast by Iranian state media that appeared to threaten President Donald Trump’s youngest son, Barron .
“The U.S.
Secret Service is aware of the video and investigates anything that can be perceived as a threat toward our protectees,” Secret Service spokesperson Nate Herring said in a statement to the media.
“Out of concern for operational security, we do not discuss matters of protective intelligence.” According to the U.K.-based news outlet Iran International , the nearly three-minute clip—which starts with a graphic that reads “Where to Kill Barron Trump”—describes efforts to reach the 20-year-old presidential son, whom the video narrator claims is under surveillance.
The video also references several locations related to Barron Trump, such as his place of study and the Trump Tower in New York, as well as his security arrangements.
The narrator also suggests a $10 million reward connected to efforts against Barron Trump.
Read More: Trump's Secret Plane Swap Was Unusual, Not Unprecedented TIME could not independently verify the claims made in the video, which provided no evidence that Barron Trump was actually under surveillance or that anyone had successfully compromised his security.
The White House referred TIME to the Secret Service when asked for a response to the threat on Barron Trump.
CNN earlier reported on the Secret Service’s knowledge of the Barron Trump threat, which was broadcast over the weekend by state-run Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB).
IRIB operates under the Supreme Leader's control.
The clip on Barron Trump follows a similar video released by the IRGC-affiliated Tasnim News Agency in July , which focused on First Lady Melania Trump, Barron’s mother.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on time.com — the content belongs to TIME.