Sports journalists stay silent on WNBA national anthem protest and high school cross country dispute

Activists or cowards? That's the question I often ask about members of the media when they go radio silent on a hot-button issue.

Do they avoid asking tough questions because they fear the answers might undermine a cause they support? Or do they stay quiet because they're scared of the blowback they'd get from their peers? DREAM AND VALKYRIES SKIP NATIONAL ANTHEM AGAIN IN WNBA FINALS GAME 2 DESPITE RULEBOOK REQUIREMENT Look no further than the past two weeks, when three major stories captured public fascination while traditional newsrooms responded with either deliberate silence or toothless coverage.

Story No.

1: The WNBA's national anthem walk-offs .

Before Games 1 and 2 of the WNBA Finals, both the Atlanta Dream and the Golden State Valkyries walked off the court before the singing of the Star Spangled Banner, only to return as soon as it was over.

Yet, besides OutKick, I couldn't find a single instance of credentialed media covering the Finals even mentioning this.

The San Jose Mercury News lauded Alanis Morissette's rendition before Game 2, but didn't appear to care that players weren't on the court for it.

And a writer from SF Gate decried how "conservative media can't stop complaining" about personnel deciding to leave the floor.

JEMELE HILL IS RIGHT: WNBA FANS EXPECT JOURNALISTS TO BE 'CHEERLEADERS,' AND THAT'S NOT HOW THIS WORKS Sorry, but this story matters to people.

And apparently, mainstream reporters have no interest in asking players or coaches about it.

OutKick's Dan Zaksheske has been ready with questions at press conferences but hasn't been called upon.

Perhaps WNBA public relations officials are concerned he'll make the people he covers uncomfortable.

They certainly don't seem worried that the other journalists in the room will.

Story No.