White House Says Viral Trump-Natalie Harp Golf Photo Is AI-Generated
Ken Cedeno / Reuters The White House has broken its silence about fake photos that show President Donald Trump and Natalie Harp being intimate on a golf course.
Two versions of what appeared to be the same AI-generated image made the rounds on social media earlier this week for supposedly showing Trump, 80, kissing a blonde woman assumed to be his “human printer,” Harp, 35.
“This is clearly a fake photo,” a White House official told the Daily Beast.
The clear version of the image has telltale signs of AI—like the woman’s right hand having six fingers.
An analysis by the fact-checking website Snopes also found a watermark indicating it was “generated with OpenAI tools.” The blurry version of the photo lacked the same watermark and was too low-resolution to show any typical AI anomalies, Snopes reported, but is fake nonetheless.
A Daily Beast review of wire services could not find photos of Harp and Trump both wearing white on a golf course.
A reverse image search found that it was first used as the thumbnail for a YouTube video by political commentator Keith Edwards, who disavowed any responsibility for the photo.
“My thumbnail team found the image online,” he told Snopes.
“We did not create or alter the underlying image, but we also did not independently verify its original source or that the woman pictured is Natalie Harp.
Given that only the back of her head is visible, I don’t think her identity can be confirmed from this image alone.” Harp first caught Trump’s attention in 2019, when she appeared on Fox News and credited legislation he signed with helping her recover from bone cancer.
The following year, she spoke at the Republican National Convention and joined Trump’s campaign.
She began working for Trump in 2022 after leaving her role as anchor and host at the right-wing news network One America News.
Harp got the moniker “human printer” by following Trump around, fulfilling his every request, including fetching merchandise, performing Google searches, printing stories from right-wing websites, and suggesting possible Truth Social posts.
She earns a taxpayer-funded salary of $150,000 a year.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.thedailybeast.com — the content belongs to The Daily Beast.
