Champion athlete soils herself mid-race and keeps going, prompting fitness competition to change rules

A popular global fitness competition is changing its rules after an explosive incident at a Sept.

12 competition.

Australian professional athlete Joanna Wietrzyk won the race at HYROX Beijing — but the victory did not come without struggle.

During the race, Wietrzyk experienced fecal incontinence but continued competing.

Despite the incident, judges and officials did not instruct her to stop, prompting concerns about potential health and safety risks for other competitors. 'A WIN IS A WIN' SAYS ATHLETE WHO DIDN'T LET A LITTLE DIARRHEA KEEP HER FROM FINISHING IN FIRST PLACE The incident has sparked online debate — some people have supported Wietrzyk for her perseverance, while others suggested that her accident posed a potential biohazard.

Wietrzyk reportedly addressed the incident in a social media post, which has since been deleted.

"Go hard or go home … a win is a win.

In all seriousness, thank you for all the support.

I’ll be back soon x," she wrote, according to multiple news outlets.

COULD 'HUMANMAXXING' ACTUALLY HELP YOU LIVE LONGER? HERE'S WHAT EXPERTS SAY The athlete has since faced criticism from those who argue that her decision posed a health risk to other competitors.

Wietrzyk’s coach, Chris Bayens, posted a statement on social media in her defense.

"What happened was an extraordinary set of circumstances that were unforeseen, rapidly evolving and almost impossible to fully comprehend in real time," he wrote on Instagram.

"Decisions were made under competition conditions by an athlete, judges and officials, all responding to a situation none of them could reasonably have prepared for." Bayens continued that these decisions can be reviewed and lessons can be learned, but "judging someone’s intent, character or morality through the clarity of hindsight is neither fair nor honest." FITNESS EXPERT VISITS GYMS NATIONWIDE, SHOUTS OUT 4 CLUBS FOR 'GETTING IT RIGHT' "Sport occasionally produces moments that are imperfect and deeply human," he said.

"Discussion is legitimate.