What the golf cart industry can teach us about China’s threat to American jobs

This week, two very different events will put the U.S.-China relationship in the spotlight.

President Donald Trump is preparing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Washington, D.C. as the two countries continue negotiations over trade and other economic issues.

At the same time, the world’s best golfers are gathering outside Chicago, IL for the Presidents Cup, where American and international players will compete at Medinah Country Club.

There is a connection between those events that deserves more attention: American manufacturing .

CHINA COZIES UP AS TRUMP TOUTS DELEGATION OF RICHEST BUSINESS HEAVYWEIGHTS AT XI SUMMIT The golfers at Medinah — and potentially President Trump himself, who has accepted the role of honorary chairman and plans to attend — will be utilizing golf carts built by Club Car at their manufacturing headquarters in Augusta, Georgia.

It is a fitting reminder of the longstanding relationship between the great game of golf and the American manufacturers that support it.

But it is becoming increasingly difficult for American companies to build and compete when foreign governments distort the market.

And what is happening in the golf-cart industry is part of a much larger story playing out across the country.

American manufacturers employ millions of people, support communities and contend every day in a global marketplace.

They should be able to outcompete based on the quality, innovation and value of what they produce — not against foreign governments willing to subsidize competitors and distort prices.

That is precisely what is happening in the low-speed personal transportation vehicle industry (LSPTV), or what most Americans simply know as golf carts.

WHITE HOUSE EXPOSES ‘TRANSSHIPMENT SCAM’ COSTING US UP TO $26B, POINTS FINGER AT CHINA In 2023, more than $522 million worth of these vehicles were imported into the United States from China—more than double the amount imported in 2021.

American manufacturers raised concerns that Chinese producers were benefiting from government subsidies and selling products in the United States at unfairly low prices.

The Department of Commerce investigated and found evidence supporting those concerns, determining that Chinese producers had benefited from countervailable subsidies and that Chinese LSPTVs were being sold in the United States at less than fair value.