Christian YouTuber Corners Vance on Trump’s Blasphemous Post
SAUL LOEB / via REUTERS Vice President JD Vance stood by the president over the crazed post that depicted him as Jesus Christ, as a Christian influencer questioned him about it.
Self-described Christian evangelist Bryce Crawford pushed back on Trump for posting an image to his Truth Social account that depicted him as Jesus.
Many at the time, including prominent conservative Christian personalities, called the post “blasphemous” and urged Trump to delete it, which he eventually did, as he claimed he thought it was a depiction of himself as a doctor in his defense of the post.
But speaking with Vance on his podcast, Crawford, 22, admitted that the post was upsetting to him due to his faith.
“I’m a Christian, I saw the photo — it made me upset,” Crawford admitted.
“I’m not going to lie, it made me upset.” Vance responded with “I hear ya, and I know the president didn’t mean any offense.” “Obviously, he loves Christians, and politically has done a lot of good for religious liberty, and certainly didn’t mean anything by it,” Vance proclaimed.
The vice president continued, “I’m biased because I see this from the inside.
So it’s like, ‘Did Donald Trump mean to post a meme of himself as God?’ No.” Crawford, a recent graduate of Liberty University, pushed back on the vice president’s argument.
“I don’t know how he thought he was a doctor in the photo,” Crawford said.
“He was [wearing] a white robe with a red sash on it, you know, and that makes me upset as a Christian.” Vance still stood by the post, asserting that even though the president posts dozens of times a day at all hours of the night, he is way too busy to spend time scrolling through his feed.
He said that his staff oftentimes “will bring him stuff” they think he will like.
“Sometimes he’ll like chuckle at it, and sometimes if he really thinks it’s funny, he’ll have somebody post it,” Vance explained.
“And that’s exactly what happened here..
“He did not mean to, like, mock or mimic God.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.thedailybeast.com — the content belongs to The Daily Beast.