A troubling recent rogue AI incident is just one reason why the U.K. AI Security Institute deserves far greater scrutiny

Hello and welcome to Eye on AI.

In this edition: The UK AISI has a new head and a big set of challenges.

Nvidia spends $6 billion to ‘reverse aquihire’ Poolside.

Hugging Face reportedly looks to sell for $13 billion.

Use of Anthropic’s top model lags.

Why Americans use chatbots for health information.

And what role should AI play in schools? Before we get to today’s AI news—please consider joining me at the inaugural Fortune AIQ Summit at the New York Stock Exchange on Oct.

1: Spend the afternoon with senior executives from companies on the Fortune AIQ 75 list and explore how you can scale your AI experimentation and translate investments into measurable business value.

I’ll be leading discussions alongside my co-hosts, Fortune Editor-in-Chief Alyson Shontell and Live Media Editorial Director Andrew Nusca.

Apply here to attend .

Ok, moving along…there were two pieces of news last week concerning the U.K.’s AI Security Institute that at first might not seem at all related—or like they might matter much to people outside the U.K.

But, bear with me.

The U.K.

AI Security Institute (or AISI, as it is commonly known, or sometimes UK AISI, to distinguish it from other countries’ AI safety and security institutes) matters globally for several reasons: the most important is that many of the frontier AI companies have voluntarily agreed to share their models with AISI for safety testing prior to their public release.