Trump threatens to demolish another DC landmark

Scaffolding and tarps cover the facade of the John F.

Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on June 30, 2026. | Al Drago/Washington Post via Getty Images This story appeared in The Logoff , a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life.

Subscribe here .

Welcome to The Logoff: President Donald Trump is threatening that if he can’t have the Kennedy Center, no one can.

What’s going on? Trump has been trying to get his name back on the John F.

Kennedy Center for Performing Arts since June, when it was removed in response to a court order.

On Monday night, the Justice Department revealed its latest ploy to make that happen.

In a court filing , the DOJ argued that if its renovation plans for the Kennedy Center aren’t allowed to go forward, “the center will deteriorate further into an unsafe, decrepit structure that will be required to be taken down” and replaced by another structure, “such as a large outdoor amphitheater.” Tied up in the proposed $250 million renovation are three new tributes to Trump, which the Kennedy Center board (stacked with Trump appointees ) voted to add earlier this month : the text “renovated and restored by President Donald J.

Trump” and “endowed by The Trump Kennedy Center Fund” on the building’s facade, and the renaming of the Kennedy Center grounds as “President Donald J.

Trump Plaza.” Those changes are currently being challenged in court by Rep.

Joyce Beatty (D-OH), who successfully sued to undo Trump’s first renaming of the center.

But the Trump administration claims her suit endangers the entire project.

What does Trump’s name have to do with the renovations? According to the DOJ filing, “an order blocking the Board from appropriately recognizing President Trump will cause donors to flee, financial contributions to dry up, and structural rehabilitation to stop.” “There will simply not be the expertise or funding necessary to rebuild and renovate this decimated structure,” it adds.

Is that true? No.