Could you soon make your own moonshine? SCOTUS takes up 160-year-old ban

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a challenge to the Reconstruction-era ban on distilling alcohol in private homes.

Why it matters: Americans can legally brew beer or make wine at home, but making whiskey, vodka or other spirits can land them in federal prison.

The Supreme Court could change that.

Driving the booze: SCOTUS will review Department of Justice v.

McNutt, an April ruling by the conservative 5th U.S.

Circuit Court of Appeals that found the nearly 160-year-old home-distilling ban unconstitutional and an overreach of Congress' taxing power.

Distilling in your home carries a penalty of up to five years in prison, a $10,000 fine or both.

The 6th Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in a separate April ruling for Ream v.

Department of the Treasury, arguing Congress can restrict distilling at home to protect federal alcohol tax collections.

What they're saying: Advocates argue that Congress overstepped their powers by banning distilling in the home through a measure meant to prohibit fraud from commercial distillers, per the Associated Press .

The government says Congress acted within its authority as the restriction was intended to stop producers from evading federal excise taxes, per AP.

Lifting the ban, the government argues, could undermine Congress' authority to enforce federal tax laws.

Friction point: Both appeals courts agreed Congress' taxing power alone doesn't authorize the ban.

They split over whether it is a permissible way to collect liquor taxes under the Constitution's Necessary and Proper Clause.