Trump Went So Far This Time That Even Fox News Won’t Stand for It

Liberals have long accused journalists of letting Donald Trump walk all over them, lying to reporters’ faces and using them as political punching bags even as he basks in the glow of their camera lights. But the press’s posture may now be changing. After Trump announced he was banning three news outlets from the White House, the major TV networks—including Fox News(!)—acted as one to protest the president’s decision. The dustup carries important implications for the First Amendment and journalists’ ability to tell the rest of us what’s going on inside this administration’s inner sanctum.

With a Truth Social post, as Trumpian brouhahas often do. On Friday afternoon, the president put out a lie-filled, haphazardly capitalized post announcing he’d banned CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House. Trump claimed the ban was “a result of their constant ‘reporting’ FAKE NEWS” and pledged that “Other Fake News Media Outlets” would get the same treatment. By Saturday, reporters from those three organizations were being denied White House access .

CNN, MS NOW, and Politico jointly sued the administration , arguing that the ban “could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment.” On Monday, the administration barred CNN from the “pool,” a rotating crop of TV journalists who film presidential events. So the other four major networks—ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC— decided to suspend the pool indefinitely . Media outlets unaffected by the ban, like the Atlantic and the Washington Post , issued statements of solidarity.

In fairness, most reporters still are. Print, online, and radio journalists continued to follow Trump as normal today. But even though everyone has a camera in their pocket these days, the TV pool is how news outlets around the world get footage of presidential events in sensitive areas, like Trump’s Oval Office meetings with world leaders or appearances aboard Air Force One . Without it, the only footage the public will see from those places is what the White House wants it to . The administration has teased that it could soon replace poolers with its own video feeds , which would effectively amount to state television. “The public has a vital interest in receiving accurate, independent information about its government,” the five major networks said in a joint statement . “No administration should restrict a news organization because it objects to its reporting.”

A federal judge named Timothy Kelly will hear the three banned outlets’ lawsuit. Trump appointed Kelly in his first term, but the judge sided with CNN in 2018 after the White House tried to yank a reporter’s press credentials. Kelly has scheduled a Wednesday hearing , which could make Trump’s ban short-lived. The president has preemptively vowed to appeal any adverse ruling.

In the meantime, the ban is already having an effect. On Monday, Trump cut the ribbon to open his new White House helipad, but the TV pool was missing and the administration’s feed was inaudible, resulting in footage of the president speaking over the sound of static .

Deciding which journalists deserve access to the White House isn’t an easy question.