Bryan Kohberger fights to remove judge who called him 'worst of the worst,' questioned his honesty

Bryan Kohberger 's new lawyer is taking another swing at Idaho prosecutors in his fight to have the judge who called his client a "faceless coward" removed from post-conviction proceedings.

Court-appointed attorney Greg Rauch is accusing Latah County prosecutors of "regurgitating" rules rather than addressing concerns raised in his motion to disqualify Judge Steven Hippler from the case.

Hippler said Kohberger, 31, "slithered" into the victims' home before committing a crime that made him "the worst of the worst" after the killer admitted guilt last year.

At issue, according to Rauch, "is how [Hippler's] statements about counsel’s preparation and [Kohberger's] capacity for truthfulness bear on the disputes it may now decide, in combination with the myriad of other statements made." KOHBERGER PROSECUTORS SAY NO AS IDAHO KILLER TRIES TO BOOT JUDGE WHO CALLED HIM A 'FACELESS COWARD' And when addressing the fact that there would be no allocution or explanation from Kohberger, the judge also questioned whether Kohberger even possessed the capacity to say something truthful.

"Even if I could force him to speak, which legally I cannot, how could anyone ever be assured that what he speaks is the truth?" Hippler asked during sentencing.

"Do we really believe, after all of this, he is capable of speaking the truth, or of giving up something of himself to help the very people whose lives he destroyed? Rather, I suspect the so-called reason would be dished out in enticing self-serving and aggrandizing untruthful bits, leaving people wanting more information, more insight, and thus enhancing even further the power he seeks to hold." BRYAN KOHBERGER DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT HE WAS DOING WHEN HE PLEADED GUILTY: UNSEALED MEMO Rauch wrote that "of course" judges can deny defense motions, "condemn terrible crimes," and go on to preside over post-conviction claims.

BRYAN KOHBERGER'S NEW LAWYER SAYS KEY QUESTIONS MAY SOON GET ANSWERS IN COURT "The question is not whether someone might criticize the Court, but whether an informed, reasonable observer could question its impartiality in light of this connected record," he wrote.

And it's not just that Hippler tore into Kohberger at sentencing.

He has also taken issue with a June scheduling order days before Kohberger surprised the country and pleaded guilty to avoid the death penalty.

"This motion does not rest upon one adverse ruling, one harsh statement, or the mere fact that the judge who presided over Bryan Kohberger’s criminal case has been assigned to his post-conviction proceeding," Rauch wrote in his initial 22-page motion on Aug.

27.