Thursday, October 8, 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇺🇸 US ▾
BREAKING
› Dominion still has pending lawsuits against election deniers such as Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell› Russia is 'going backwards' in equipment and deploying post WWII-era tanks, according to Western officials› Podcast: One country musician is calling for other artists to oppose assault rifles› Bidets save you money and reduce waste — we tested the best options out there› 50+ products to make your life easier and our planet cleaner› Mother's Day is around the corner. Here are 50+ thoughtful gifts she'll love› A head-to-toe guide of how men should dress this spring, and where they should shop› 42 of the most useful travel products you can buy on Amazon› The 7 best high-yield savings accounts of April 2023› Taxes are due tomorrow. Here's how to file for an extension› Dominion still has pending lawsuits against election deniers such as Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell› Russia is 'going backwards' in equipment and deploying post WWII-era tanks, according to Western officials› Podcast: One country musician is calling for other artists to oppose assault rifles› Bidets save you money and reduce waste — we tested the best options out there› 50+ products to make your life easier and our planet cleaner› Mother's Day is around the corner. Here are 50+ thoughtful gifts she'll love› A head-to-toe guide of how men should dress this spring, and where they should shop› 42 of the most useful travel products you can buy on Amazon› The 7 best high-yield savings accounts of April 2023› Taxes are due tomorrow. Here's how to file for an extension
Latest

MAGA Justices Rage at Court for Stopping Trump’s Ballot Plot

The Daily Beast ·
MAGA Justices Rage at Court for Stopping Trump’s Ballot Plot

Vincenzo Livieri / REUTERS The Supreme Court has blocked Donald Trump’s controversial plans to alter mail-in voting—over the dissents of the court’s two most right-wing members.

In an unsigned order , the court determined that the government was “unlikely to succeed on the merits” of the case, which stems from Trump’s executive order mandating a series of new rules.

Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurrence, said that while the government might ultimately win the issue, “state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the election.” But Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.

Alito wasn’t swayed by logistical concerns about implementing the changes.

“The government has a strong interest in enforcing the rule, and implementing it will also ‘en­hance the visibility of Federal Ballot Mail’ in order to better detect election fraud,” Alito wrote.

“On the other side of the balance, the plaintiff States invoke the practical ef­fects of implementing the rule close to the midterm elec­tions.

I take that problem very seriously, but it is not enough to convince me to deny the application.” This is a developing story and will be updated.

Read more at The Daily Beast.

Read the full article on The Daily Beast ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.thedailybeast.com — the content belongs to The Daily Beast.

More from The Daily Beast

See all ›

More in Latest

See all ›