Thursday, October 15, 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇺🇸 US ▾
BREAKING
› Jerry Seinfeld turns tables on radical anti-Israel agitators after chaotic Chicago stunt backfires› Dominion still has pending lawsuits against election deniers such as Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell› Russia is 'going backwards' in equipment and deploying post WWII-era tanks, according to Western officials› Podcast: One country musician is calling for other artists to oppose assault rifles› Bidets save you money and reduce waste — we tested the best options out there› 50+ products to make your life easier and our planet cleaner› Mother's Day is around the corner. Here are 50+ thoughtful gifts she'll love› A head-to-toe guide of how men should dress this spring, and where they should shop› 42 of the most useful travel products you can buy on Amazon› The 7 best high-yield savings accounts of April 2023› Jerry Seinfeld turns tables on radical anti-Israel agitators after chaotic Chicago stunt backfires› Dominion still has pending lawsuits against election deniers such as Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell› Russia is 'going backwards' in equipment and deploying post WWII-era tanks, according to Western officials› Podcast: One country musician is calling for other artists to oppose assault rifles› Bidets save you money and reduce waste — we tested the best options out there› 50+ products to make your life easier and our planet cleaner› Mother's Day is around the corner. Here are 50+ thoughtful gifts she'll love› A head-to-toe guide of how men should dress this spring, and where they should shop› 42 of the most useful travel products you can buy on Amazon› The 7 best high-yield savings accounts of April 2023
Technology

Hegseth’s dubious low-T screening may flag up to 25 percent of the Army

Ars Technica ·
Hegseth’s dubious low-T screening may flag up to 25 percent of the Army

Up to a quarter of active-duty Army members could receive a low testosterone result from mandatory military screening, despite the true prevalence of the condition likely being a tiny fraction of that figure, according to a study published Thursday in JAMA .

The finding adds to concerns that the mandatory screening announced by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in July will lead to a cascade of unnecessary medical evaluations for military members.

Those evaluations could result in inappropriate testing, inaccurate results and diagnoses, and overtreatment that could cause harm, including infertility.

Medical experts, including the Endocrine Society and the American Urological Association (AUA), have recommended against blanket screenings for these reasons.

Still, the Pentagon has moved forward with the plans, releasing clinical guidance in September .

The JAMA study highlights the reasons why testosterone levels are not measured in men without symptoms—and also offers a glimpse of how many Army members could become ensnared in the clinically dubious screenings.

Read full article Comments

Read the full article on Ars Technica ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on arstechnica.com — the content belongs to Ars Technica.

More from Ars Technica

See all ›

More in Technology

See all ›