Latest

Why the Wild Coast Exploration Permit Was Always Defective

Mail & Guardian · 13 October 2026 at 14:55

Why the Wild Coast Exploration Permit Was Always Defective

The Constitutional Court's definitive ruling against Shell and Impact Africa's exploration permit along the Wild Coast affirms that meaningful community consultation and environmental accountability are mandatory legal requirements under South African law.

Read the full article

Read the full article on Mail & Guardian ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on mg.co.za — the content belongs to Mail & Guardian.

Why the Wild Coast Exploration Permit Was Always Defective

More from Mail & Guardian

State raises witness safety concerns as Sibiya’s defence challenges detention

New COSATU national leadership elected

AKA’s road manager recounts fatal shooting as bodyguard’s whereabouts come under scrutiny

Position: Executive Director, Properties & Services, University of Cape Town

More in Latest

US company announces progress toward resurrecting the extinct dodo

Costa Rica opens mega-prison as organized crime fight intensifies

Brazil’s Senate approves shorter workweek in win for Lula

US rejects recommendation for ICE body cams to be automatically activated

BAT warns South Africa is losing battle against criminal syndicates

ROSS HARVEY | Where are the dividends from democracy?