Saturday 10 October 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇦🇺 AU ▾
BREAKING
› Rui Pinto to remain under witness protection after U-turn by Portuguese authorities› ICJ judge Navi Pillay dedicates Nobel peace prize to ‘survivors of international crimes’ as Israel condemns award - live› Maresca says Manchester City titles not tainted; Liverpool’s Isak and Gakpo injured – live› Australia reach 187-6 against South Africa on first day of the men’s Test series – as it happened› Fab Phoebe leads Aussie win as Megan shoots for stars against Bangladesh› 2027 Isuzu NMS 45-150 AWD review: Quick drive› Russian war blog Rybar founder arrested in Montenegro› New spate of stabbings, overdoses and fires at Australian immigration detention centres run by ICE-linked US prison firm› Offensive tirades on race and religion shouldn’t be the norm in Australian politics› The fight over using super for housing has deep roots in Australian politics. But would it actually work? | Emily Millane› Rui Pinto to remain under witness protection after U-turn by Portuguese authorities› ICJ judge Navi Pillay dedicates Nobel peace prize to ‘survivors of international crimes’ as Israel condemns award - live› Maresca says Manchester City titles not tainted; Liverpool’s Isak and Gakpo injured – live› Australia reach 187-6 against South Africa on first day of the men’s Test series – as it happened› Fab Phoebe leads Aussie win as Megan shoots for stars against Bangladesh› 2027 Isuzu NMS 45-150 AWD review: Quick drive› Russian war blog Rybar founder arrested in Montenegro› New spate of stabbings, overdoses and fires at Australian immigration detention centres run by ICE-linked US prison firm› Offensive tirades on race and religion shouldn’t be the norm in Australian politics› The fight over using super for housing has deep roots in Australian politics. But would it actually work? | Emily Millane
Science

Australia’s social media ban has an enforcement problem. These new laws aim to fix it

The Conversation Australia ·
Australia’s social media ban has an enforcement problem. These new laws aim to fix it

Elva Etienne/Getty Images In the same week the federal government is preparing to introduce its landmark digital duty of care legislation, it is also returning to some unfinished business: strengthening its social media age restrictions.

On Tuesday, the government will move an amendment through federal parliament to give the eSafety Commissioner stronger powers to investigate whether social media platforms are complying with the minimum age rules.

The changes bring these investigative powers into line with those eSafety already has for other online safety obligations.

Why is the government introducing these laws? Australia’s social media age restrictions came into effect in December last year.

They require major social media platforms to take “reasonable steps” to stop Australians under 16 from holding accounts.

Importantly, the law doesn’t punish teenagers for using designated platforms.

The legal responsibility sits with the platforms to keep them from holding an account.

However, there are already serious questions about platform compliance.

A recent study provides some of the clearest evidence so far.

Researchers followed more than 400 Australian teenagers before and after the restrictions took effect.

Three months in, more than 85% of participants aged under 16 were still using social media platforms covered by the law.

Most were accessing them through their own accounts.

There was certainly some circumvention.

Of those that attempted to use a restricted service, between 15% and 19% reported using a fake account, while 6% to 11% reported accessing social media through a private browser.

Read the full article on The Conversation Australia ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on theconversation.com — the content belongs to The Conversation Australia.

More from The Conversation Australia

See all ›

More in Science

See all ›