Monday, October 12, 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇨🇦 CA ▾
BREAKING
› Editorial cartoons from the past week (Oct. 12, 2026)› Gates Foundation and Wellcome Leap Commit $100 Million to Reduce Global Stillbirth Rates› How a Mexico-U.S. trade deal could set the terms for Canada› J.D. Tuccille: AI execs don’t want safety. They want to block competitors› Iran’s Art of War: How the Treasury market became the real battlefield› ‘More than 1,000 words’: AI models could be used to communicate procedures to cancer patients› DEAR ABBY: Campaign sign leads to marital strife› Kate Marland: Tearing down B.C. Human Rights Tribunal should be only the start› Canadian startup Q-Block liberates quantum lab gear by shrinking it to shoebox size› Zelenskyy says Russia violating Trump's 'energy ceasefire' as attacks on Ukraine continue› Editorial cartoons from the past week (Oct. 12, 2026)› Gates Foundation and Wellcome Leap Commit $100 Million to Reduce Global Stillbirth Rates› How a Mexico-U.S. trade deal could set the terms for Canada› J.D. Tuccille: AI execs don’t want safety. They want to block competitors› Iran’s Art of War: How the Treasury market became the real battlefield› ‘More than 1,000 words’: AI models could be used to communicate procedures to cancer patients› DEAR ABBY: Campaign sign leads to marital strife› Kate Marland: Tearing down B.C. Human Rights Tribunal should be only the start› Canadian startup Q-Block liberates quantum lab gear by shrinking it to shoebox size› Zelenskyy says Russia violating Trump's 'energy ceasefire' as attacks on Ukraine continue
Latest

J.D. Tuccille: AI execs don’t want safety. They want to block competitors

National Post ·

If you take recent statements by some artificial intelligence (AI) executives at face value, they’re demanding that governments stop them before they destroy the world as they call for regulation and oversight .

It’s a curious position for innovators who have made grand claims about their products’ potential and who could, presumably, simply drop their efforts if they believe the risks outweigh the benefits.

Their position seemingly ignores the reality that, if they get their way, dissenters will almost certainly move their highly mobile work to jurisdictions that maintain a light regulatory touch.

But it all makes more sense when you remember that established businesses have a history of asking politicians to impose red tape burdens that pose barriers to entry for upstart competitors.

Read More

Read the full article on National Post ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on nationalpost.com — the content belongs to National Post.

More from National Post

See all ›

More in Latest

See all ›