Thursday, October 8, 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇨🇦 CA ▾
BREAKING
› Opinion: Ultra-rich British Columbians like me should welcome new taxes› Opinion: Housing and climate are inextricably linked. We must see action on both this election› B.C. Conservatives drop, distance themselves from Victoria-Beacon Hill candidate after controversial tweets surface› LILLEY: Out of ideas and out of gas, Chow’s campaign runs on fear› Senators’ Hoyt Stanley to make NHL debut vs. Flyers› Surrey debt collector fined $34,000 for harassment of customers, threat of 'financial annihilation'› The suspicious texts on day of Toronto airport gold heist between Air Canada workers accused of pulling it off› Braid: Separatist leaders' bumbling in U.S. at least warned us of American threat› Canucks on Sportsnet: Vancouver vs. Carolina› BATRA’S BURNING QUESTIONS: Will Toronto choose Olivia Chow or Brad Bradford to lead the city?› Opinion: Ultra-rich British Columbians like me should welcome new taxes› Opinion: Housing and climate are inextricably linked. We must see action on both this election› B.C. Conservatives drop, distance themselves from Victoria-Beacon Hill candidate after controversial tweets surface› LILLEY: Out of ideas and out of gas, Chow’s campaign runs on fear› Senators’ Hoyt Stanley to make NHL debut vs. Flyers› Surrey debt collector fined $34,000 for harassment of customers, threat of 'financial annihilation'› The suspicious texts on day of Toronto airport gold heist between Air Canada workers accused of pulling it off› Braid: Separatist leaders' bumbling in U.S. at least warned us of American threat› Canucks on Sportsnet: Vancouver vs. Carolina› BATRA’S BURNING QUESTIONS: Will Toronto choose Olivia Chow or Brad Bradford to lead the city?
Business

Fed policymakers rally around the ‘price stability flag’ in rate hike

Financial Post ·

The U.S. Federal Reserve has done what markets overwhelmingly expected (and President Donald Trump vehemently opposed) and raised its policy interest rate to a target range of 3.75 per cent to four per cent — its first hike in three years — as inflation remains stubbornly above the central bank’s two per cent target.

“The plain fact is that inflation is too high and has been for too long,” Fed chair Kevin Warsh said at an afternoon press conference. “This summer’s inflation readings do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved.”

Here’s what three economists had to say about the Fed’s decision and the outlook for future rate hikes.

SUBSCRIBER EXCLUSIVE: FP West: Energy Insider brings you behind the oilpatch’s closed doors with exclusive insights from insiders every Wednesday morning.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

In a note, TD Economics director and senior economist Thomas Feltmate said the Fed’s decision was widely anticipated amid higher oil prices and August’s hotter-than-expected inflation, which came in at 3.4 per cent.

“Holding rates steady risked undermining the Fed’s commitment to returning price stability, potentially pushing longer-term Treasury yields even higher,” he said. “Instead, the rate hike and hawkish shift in the dot plot provided some reassurance to market participants, leading to a modest flattening in the yield curve.”

The question now is how many more rate hikes are on the table. Feltmate said a “one and done” approach would be “inconsequential” for both economic growth and fighting inflation.

“But we would also argue that current Fed futures pricing of nearly three additional hikes over the next year is overstated,” he said. “Delivering on one more quarter-point hike at its next meeting would largely undo last year’s insurance cuts and move the policy stance into a slightly more restrictive setting.”

Read the full article on Financial Post ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on financialpost.com — the content belongs to Financial Post.

More from Financial Post

See all ›

More in Business

See all ›