AI has changed investing. Or has it changed investors?
This is a Mint Premium article gifted to you. Subscribe to enjoy similar stories.
Artificial Intelligence has probably become the most powerful financial assistant available to investors today. Whether you want to understand mutual funds, compare investment options, estimate your retirement corpus or review your portfolio, AI can provide detailed answers within seconds. Questions that would have taken hours of searching through articles and videos can now be explored through a simple conversation.
As someone who uses AI extensively in my own work, I see this as a positive development. Better-informed investors usually make better decisions, and AI has made financial knowledge far more accessible. It has encouraged people to ask better questions and take greater interest in their financial lives.
However, over the past few months, I have also started noticing a subtle behavioural shift.
Increasingly, prospective clients walk into my office carrying AI-generated portfolio reviews. Many conversations now begin not with, “How should I invest?” but with, “AI says this about my portfolio. Do you agree?”
Towards the end of one such meeting, a prospective client asked me a question that has stayed with me ever since.
“If AI has already analyzed my portfolio so thoroughly, what additional value does a financial adviser really bring?”
It is a perfectly reasonable question. But the more I reflected on it, the more I realized that we may be asking the wrong question. The real question is not whether AI can analyze a portfolio. It clearly can. Nor is the question whether investors should use AI. I believe they absolutely should.
The more interesting question is this: What happens to investor behaviour when financial information, analysis and seemingly personalized guidance become available instantly and almost free?
I don't think AI has changed the principles of investing. Diversification, asset allocation , patience and discipline remain just as important today as they were before AI entered our lives. What has changed is the ease with which we respond to uncertainty.
A few years ago, if investors felt anxious after a market correction, there was usually a natural pause before they acted. They would wait for their next review meeting, speak to their adviser or simply give themselves time to think. That pause often helped because emotions had time to settle.
The moment uncertainty appears, AI is available. A portfolio can be reviewed within minutes. If one explanation doesn't feel convincing enough, another prompt or another AI platform is only seconds away.
There is nothing wrong with using AI to learn. The challenge begins when we start seeking repeated reassurance rather than better understanding.
I realized this when a client returned just a few weeks after we had discussed an AI-generated portfolio review. His goals hadn't changed. His income was the same. Even the markets had not moved enough to justify a different strategy. What had changed was simply his desire for another review after someone suggested trying a different prompt.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.livemint.com — the content belongs to LiveMint - Money.