Saturday, October 10, 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇺🇸 US ▾
BREAKING
› Dominion still has pending lawsuits against election deniers such as Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell› Russia is 'going backwards' in equipment and deploying post WWII-era tanks, according to Western officials› Podcast: One country musician is calling for other artists to oppose assault rifles› Bidets save you money and reduce waste — we tested the best options out there› 50+ products to make your life easier and our planet cleaner› Mother's Day is around the corner. Here are 50+ thoughtful gifts she'll love› A head-to-toe guide of how men should dress this spring, and where they should shop› 42 of the most useful travel products you can buy on Amazon› The 7 best high-yield savings accounts of April 2023› Taxes are due tomorrow. Here's how to file for an extension› Dominion still has pending lawsuits against election deniers such as Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell› Russia is 'going backwards' in equipment and deploying post WWII-era tanks, according to Western officials› Podcast: One country musician is calling for other artists to oppose assault rifles› Bidets save you money and reduce waste — we tested the best options out there› 50+ products to make your life easier and our planet cleaner› Mother's Day is around the corner. Here are 50+ thoughtful gifts she'll love› A head-to-toe guide of how men should dress this spring, and where they should shop› 42 of the most useful travel products you can buy on Amazon› The 7 best high-yield savings accounts of April 2023› Taxes are due tomorrow. Here's how to file for an extension
Technology

Trump’s sneaky plan to gut Endangered Species Act draws from 1995 Scalia dissent

Ars Technica ·
Trump’s sneaky plan to gut Endangered Species Act draws from 1995 Scalia dissent

Last week, The New York Times reported that an internal memo had been quietly distributed across US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) field offices, directing staff to radically reinterpret the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in a move that blindsided conservationists.

Staffers were essentially asked to start looking the other way when private interests cause preventable deaths of vulnerable animals.

Instead of prohibiting habitat modifications that injure animals or cause accidental deaths, the ESA will now only prohibit actions “specifically intending to target an animal,” FWS Director Brian Nesvik instructed staff in the September 14 memo.

“A vessel that inadvertently strikes a whale has not taken it because the vessel’s course was not set against the whale,” Nesvik’s memo said.

“Felling a tree is not a take of the bats roosting in it unless the tree is felled for the purpose of killing or capturing them.” Read full article Comments

Read the full article on Ars Technica ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on arstechnica.com — the content belongs to Ars Technica.

More from Ars Technica

See all ›

More in Technology

See all ›