‘Another Trump Attempt to Rig Elections’: Lawmakers Respond to Supreme Court Win for Trump Mail-in Voting Restrictions

Signage of mail-in voting drop off at the Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Elections Office during a primary election in Doral, Florida, on Aug.

18, 2026. —Eva Marie Uzcategui - Bloomberg via Getty Images The Supreme Court has handed President Donald Trump a victory in his efforts to restrict mail-in voting ahead of November’s crucial midterm elections .

In an unsigned 6-3 ruling , with the court’s liberal justices dissenting, the Supreme Court lifted a lower court’s June block on the President’s Executive Order targeting mail-in voting after 23 Democratic states and Washington D.C. sued the Administration for the order’s alleged unconstitutionality and presidential overreach.

Democrat lawmakers have responded furiously to Monday’s decision.

“Another day, another Trump attempt to rig elections and destroy democracy,” said California Governor Gavin Newsom on social media.

“We can stop this.

Vote this November.” Trump, in his push to remake American elections, has repeatedly blamed mail-in voting for widespread electoral fraud.

He claimed that mail-in ballots helped him lose in the 2020 election despite audits already refuting those claims, and his own voting by mail in recent elections.

The ruling does not settle whether the Executive Order will proceed ahead of the November midterms, where the Republican Party needs to defend its narrow majority in Congress.

Part of the order covering the U.S.

Postal Service remains blocked under a separate injunction in August, which still needs to be resolved.

The Supreme Court also did not outright rule on the legality of Trump’s order—only on the timing of the challenges to it—and left it open to future lawsuits, which critics have signaled they will file.

Here’s how other Democrats, as well as some Republicans, have responded to the decision, and what it means for November’s pivotal midterms.

Democrats vow legal challenges against “terrible” Supreme Court decision Gov.