How Climate Change Is Messing With Your Blood
—Photo-Illustration by Chloe Dowling for TIME (Source Images: quantic69/Getty Images, Luke Sharrett—Bloomberg/Getty Images) Rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere do a lot of damage—heat waves, droughts, wildfires, superstorms.
Now it appears there’s another knock-on effect that had never before been measured.
According to a new study in the journal Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health , the changing chemistry of the atmosphere could be leading to changing chemistry in our blood—with potentially dangerous effects.
If CO2 is indeed messing with our blood, it’s no wonder.
During the early rise of Homo sapiens , carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere measured a consistent 280 parts per million (ppm) .
Those conditions prevailed until roughly the middle of the 18th century when the Industrial Revolution began pouring greenhouse gasses into the air from factory smokestacks.
By 1900, CO2 levels had risen to nearly 300 ppm ; by 1980, that figure had jumped to nearly 330 ppm .
Since then the numbers have exploded, standing at 425 ppm today .
That’s very bad news for the health of the planet—and equally bad for the health of our bodies .
Every breath we take—indoors or out—draws in more carbon dioxide than our bodies were originally adapted to cope with.
To determine just what the impact of this is, environmental geoscientist Phil Bierwirth, of Australian National University in Canberra, and environmental health scientist Alexander Larcombe, of the University of Western Australia, took advantage of a 21-year survey—from 1999 to 2020—conducted by the U.S.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey ( NHANES ), during which government investigators sampled the blood of 7,000 subjects every other year to see how the body responded to all manner of environmental pollutants.
The period the NHANES researchers surveyed was a particularly bad one for the planet when it comes to carbon dioxide emissions, since in just those 21 years, U.S.
CO2 levels rose from 369 ppm to 420 ppm.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on time.com — the content belongs to TIME.
