When it comes to election advice, maybe AI isnt so bad after all?

When I read on NPR this week that people are turning to ChatGPT to tell them how to vote, I shook my head.

Here we go again, I thought: another search for the easy way out.

Voting is too serious of a right to turn over the thought process to AI.

Then I ran the experiment myself, and while I still stand by my old-world views of doing the homework yourself, I must admit that, barring just voting blindly, AI might be better than doing nothing at all.

Politics has been my obsession for as long as I can remember.

In college, one of my top goals was to become a press secretary on Capitol Hill.

I got there at 23, the youngest press secretary on the Hill at the time, and spent seven years there before moving into a career in public relations.

Now, in a bit of a full-circle moment, I'm an opinion columnist writing about politics for several sites.

That’s why I have always taken the right to vote very seriously, and for most of my life, I prided myself on voting for the best person, not the party.

That self-imposed rule came undone in recent years.

I won't pretend otherwise.

But my politics are beside the point here.

Because of who I am, and my encyclopedic knowledge of politics, my friends, neighbors and family from all over the country reach out to ask who they should vote for in their districts and states.

SEE ALSO: Who are we expecting to save us from AI? Until a few years ago, I never would have offered a name or a party.