We're not about to awaken an evil digital god — AI is far more likely to end in a great disappointment
A gift from Live Science Pro This is a Live Science Pro article that we're putting out for free.
If you liked this story, please consider subscribing .
Artificial intelligence (AI) terrifies us partly because it is new and partly because it is disturbingly familiar.
We have invented machines that converse, flatter, argue and improvise with uncanny fluency.
Confronted by this synthetic reflection, we behave like early humans seeing a mirror for the first time: We project consciousness behind the glass, then populate it with our expected behaviors, emotions, hopes and nightmares.
In other words, we scare ourselves.
Today's frontier models are impressively good at writing, coding and math .
Yet they still fail at ingredients of useful artificial general intelligence (AGI), a system that matches or surpasses human capabilities such as consistent reasoning, long-term planning, factual consistency and reliable performance outside their "experience" (the data they were trained on).
We are right to worry about the theoretical dangers of artificial superintelligence (ASI) because of the danger that such a system might outwit its human creators and pursue its own ends, potentially at our expense.
While some AI executives have asserted that we've reached AGI , these claims are contentious and do not meet more considered definitions of AGI .
It's easy to fear such a potentially advanced technology, but extravagant worst-case scenarios obscure more immediate and important risks.
The most likely danger is not a digital god awakening and launching a Hollywood-style war against humanity.
After all, AI depends on electricity, cooling, data centers, specialized chips, networks, technicians and sprawling supply chains, all of which are scarce and often fragile.
Interrupt the power, restrict the graphics processing units (GPUs) used to train them, disable the cooling or disconnect the network, and in most scenarios, the supposedly omnipotent machine that's out to kill humanity stops.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.livescience.com — the content belongs to Live Science.