Friday, 9 October 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇿🇦 ZA ▾
BREAKING
› Baboons have revealed their hand, and that’s why a sanctuary is the best option› Fix the RAF before seeking new revenue streams from South Africans› GROUNDUP: Ekurhuleni police force employed convicted killers, Parliament told› Analysis: Ramokgopa plays the gas procurement trump card from his energy plan deck› AGE OF ACCOUNTABILITY: DA asks court to make Nelson Mandela Bay mayor pay for R25m transformer lease› EXTREME WEATHER WOES: El Niño here until at least February as sea surface temperatures hit record highs› SA’s foreign service is becoming a retreat for failed ministers› CATCH IT EARLY OP-ED: Mental healthcare for young South Africans needs a wider front door› OBITUARY: The quiet authority of Khulu Phasiwe, the voice South Africa heard in the dark› Navigating medical scheme annual increases› Baboons have revealed their hand, and that’s why a sanctuary is the best option› Fix the RAF before seeking new revenue streams from South Africans› GROUNDUP: Ekurhuleni police force employed convicted killers, Parliament told› Analysis: Ramokgopa plays the gas procurement trump card from his energy plan deck› AGE OF ACCOUNTABILITY: DA asks court to make Nelson Mandela Bay mayor pay for R25m transformer lease› EXTREME WEATHER WOES: El Niño here until at least February as sea surface temperatures hit record highs› SA’s foreign service is becoming a retreat for failed ministers› CATCH IT EARLY OP-ED: Mental healthcare for young South Africans needs a wider front door› OBITUARY: The quiet authority of Khulu Phasiwe, the voice South Africa heard in the dark› Navigating medical scheme annual increases
Science

Africa gets only 23% of the climate finance it needs – and pays too much for it

The Conversation Africa ·
Africa gets only 23% of the climate finance it needs – and pays too much for it

African countries have committed themselves to cutting greenhouse gas emissions and protecting their people from the worsening effects of climate change.

These commitments form part of the Paris Agreement , an international climate treaty adopted in 2015 in which countries agreed to take steps to limit global warming.

Doing this requires billions of dollars in climate finance for clean energy and for making agriculture, water systems and infrastructure resilient to climate change.

But the finance reaching Africa falls far short.

The continent received an average of US$43.7 billion a year in 2021 and 2022 – only about 23% of what is needed.

Africa needs roughly four dollars for every dollar it currently receives.

Read more: The international order is shifting: African countries have an opportunity to reshape global power relations The money is also distributed unevenly.

The ten African countries most vulnerable to climate change receive only 11% of the continent’s climate finance, while another ten attract 76% of private climate investment.

African countries need financing for mitigation (reducing the emissions causing climate change) and adaptation (preparing people, economies and infrastructure for unavoidable droughts, floods and extreme heat).

Current finance covers only 18% of planned mitigation projects and 20% of adaptation costs.

I’m an economist specialising in climate change and governance , with a long background at the United Nations and the African Union.

I argue that Africa may be committed to the Paris Agreement, but the international financial system is pricing much of the continent out of implementing it.

Climate finance tends to flow to countries where investors believe their money will be safe and profitable.

Countries needing the most help often receive the least because investors see them as less likely to repay loans or produce sufficient returns.

Read the full article on The Conversation Africa ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on theconversation.com — the content belongs to The Conversation Africa.

More from The Conversation Africa

See all ›

More in Science

See all ›